• Users Online: 112
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 16  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 169-175

Comparative study to correlate between two different radiographically determined condylar inclination with different facial forms in completely edentulous patients


1 Department of Prosthodontics, Vinayaka Missions Sankarachariyar Dental College, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India
2 Department of Prosthodontics, SRM Dental College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Date of Submission06-Aug-2019
Date of Acceptance27-Aug-2019
Date of Web Publication28-Feb-2020

Correspondence Address:
Brintha J. Jei
Department of Prosthodontics, SRM Dental College, Chennai 600 078, Tamil Nadu
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/tdj.tdj_30_18

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Context
Many studies have determined condylar inclination (CI) by various clinical and radiography methods. But there was no previous study to find the correlation between facial forms and CI. So, this study made an effort to find any relation that exists between facial forms and CI in completely edentulous patients.
Aim
This study determined the relation of CI of completely edentulous patients in square, square tapering, tapering, and ovoid facial forms using two different radiographic methods.
Materials and methods
CI was recorded for 20 individuals, five for each group. For each individual CI was recorded by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and digital cephalogram with the occlusal rims in centric position. The CI was measured by the angle formed between the Frankfort horizontal plane and line joining the deepest point in the glenoid fossa (point A) and articular eminence (point B). Clinically, the facial forms were recorded by digital photographic records and were analyzed using the image analyzing software.
Results
The data obtained were statistically analyzed using the Kruskal–Wallis test and Mann–Whitney test with Bonferroni correction for multiple pairwise comparison and facial forms were analyzed with digital cephalogram and CBCT. It had shown significant values for group III and group IV.
Conclusion
The obtained values for all the four facial forms were clinically relevant and can be used to program the semiadjustable articulator. CBCT was the better imaging technique to record CI and can be employed.

Keywords: condylar inclination, cone beam computed tomography, digital cephalogram, digital photography, facial form


How to cite this article:
AthiR, MuthuK, Jei BJ. Comparative study to correlate between two different radiographically determined condylar inclination with different facial forms in completely edentulous patients. Tanta Dent J 2019;16:169-75

How to cite this URL:
AthiR, MuthuK, Jei BJ. Comparative study to correlate between two different radiographically determined condylar inclination with different facial forms in completely edentulous patients. Tanta Dent J [serial online] 2019 [cited 2020 Mar 28];16:169-75. Available from: http://www.tmj.eg.net/text.asp?2019/16/4/169/279730


  Introduction Top


Rehabilitation of the edentulous patient is one of the most mystifying challenges in dentistry as providing harmony among the occlusal surfaces of the artificial teeth. Condylar inclination (CI) plays a key role in both function and preservation of the surrounding structures. Among the five factors governing the articulation which was given by Hanau, CI is the most important and essential factor for obtaining balanced occlusion[1],[2]. According to the glossary of prosthodontic terms CI is defined as 'mandibular guidance generated by the condyle and articular disk traversing the contour of the glenoid fossae.' The condyle descends along the posterior slope of the articular eminence of the mandibular fossa when it moves out of centric relation position [3–6]. The amount of inferior movement of the condyle when the mandible is protruded is based on the steepness of articular eminence[7].

Clinically, condylar guidance is measured by interocclusal records; it forms an equivalent angle of 30.4° with the horizontal reference plane approximating the anatomic limits of the TMJ and can vary from steep to shallow in different patients[8],[9]. Several studies have shown the unreliability of recording and replicating condylar guidance using these methods [10–13]. With this uncertainty, recent studies have proved the liability of radiographs as a valuable aid to determine CI. So, to record CI accurately radiographic methods can be used as they use stable bony landmarks. Gilbao et al.[14] determined the radiographic outline of the glenoid fossa and articular eminence in a radiographic image which represents the equivalent outlines of the condylar path in the skull and determines CI which can be studied without altering the function of the participant.

The temporal constituent is S-shaped in adults, consisting of a prominent articular eminence on which the condylar process slides during mandibular movements and a concave mandibular fossa. The clinical significance of the condyle–fossa relationship affects the morphology of the face and the position of the mandible[15],[16]. The face was divided into simple ratios by the famous artist Leonardo Da Vinci in the 15th century for an esthetic evaluation of proportions. Later Leon Williams classified facial forms in the frontal plane as square, tapering, and ovoid which influenced the selection of anterior teeth in edentulous patients[17]. Heartwell further divided facial forms into four types. Salzmann and Sassouni grouped facial forms into square, square tapering, tapering, and ovoid using the bony landmarks euryon, zygion, and gonion [18–21]. Various studies had found the relationship of articular eminence morphology with different skeletal groups but there were no previous study to find the relation between facial forms and CI.

Therefore, this study aims to find out the CI of completely edentulous patients determined using two radiographic imaging techniques and the determined CI was correlated with four different facial forms in the frontal plane.


  Materials and Methods Top


The protocol of the study and the informed consent were approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (SRMU/M and HS/SRMDC/2012/M.D.S-PG Student/201) before the start of the study. The study comprised a total of 20 completely edentulous patients of either gender, in the age group of between 40 and 70 years. All patients were informed about the aim of this research and written consents were signed from them to participate in this research.

Inclusion criteria included patients with class 1 ridge relationship, adequate inter-ridge distance, well-rounded ridges, no TMJ disorders, first-time denture wearers, and edentulous for a period of 3–8 months. Exclusion criteria were poor neuromuscular coordination, flabby, uneven or atrophic ridges, with TMJ disorders, history of systemic diseases, and repeated complete denture wearers. The patients were divided into four groups of five in each group [Table 1] based on facial forms.
Table 1: Grouping based on facial forms

Click here to view
Figure 1: Square facial form.

Click here to view
Figure 2: Square tapering facial form.

Click here to view
Figure 3: Tapering facial form.

Click here to view
Figure 4: Ovoid facial form.

Click here to view


Facial form determination

Photographs of completely edentulous patients were captured using a photographic setup consisting of digital single-lens reflex camera EOS 550D Canon with 50 mm lens EF-S1 and an effective focal length of 9 AF points (×0.87 magnification) with the maximum resolution of 18.0 megapixel with CMOS sensor. To standardize the procedure, images were made with the help of a tripod (positioned in front and at the eye level of the patients to avoid blurry edges and instability). A nonreflective light gray background was used to obtain well-defined images.

The patients were positioned 120 cm in front of the background and all the pictures were made in the aperture priority mode of camera with built-in flashlight for uniform and constant illumination and shutter speed of 1/125 per se cond and the opening diaphragm f/5.6 cross-type center.

To assure standardized image, heads were positioned at the center of the image using the focus point in the camera. The eyes and ears were parallel to the transverse plane and the floor, with the patient looking forward and facial median line perpendicular to the floor in the sagittal plane. The camera lens was kept 5 feet away from the participant. Patients were positioned on a line marked on the floor and framed alongside a vertical metallic centimeter scale, allowing calibration of measurements at life-size (1:1).

The patient's forehead, neck, and ears were clearly visible during the recording with their lips relaxed and looking into their eyes in the vertical mirror on the opposite side, ∼110 cm from the patient. To standardize the images in natural head position, the patients were asked to walk few steps, stand at rest position facing the camera, and was positioned near the scale, look into their eyes in the mirror, placing their arms at their side and their lips were compatible. Eyewear, if any, was removed and the operator ensured that the patient's forehead, neck, and ears were clearly made visible during the recording procedure. The digital photographic records were analyzed using the image analyzing software – Adobe Photoshop Creative Suite 53. Images were changed to gray scale by Adobe Photoshop version 5 (Adobe Systems Complex, San Jose, California, USA), and saved in the JPEG format for digitization. The freeform pen of the software tool was used to draw precise paths, connecting the cephalometric landmarks like euryon (E), zygion (Z), and gonion (G) on one side of the face and the other joining the points euryon (E'), zygion (Z'), and gonion (G') on the contralateral side of the face on each photograph to determine the facial form of each individual.

Prior to imaging procedure

In order to make the digital cephalogram and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) radiographic images of the patients in centric relation, primary and final impressions of maxillary and mandibular arch of each patient were made with routine standardized procedures. Master casts were prepared using type III dental stone. To standardize the procedure, temporary record bases were fabricated on the master cast with thermoplastic vinyl sheets of 1.5 mm thickness using vacuum press machine4 and finished. Wax occlusal rims were fabricated for maxillary and mandibular ridges. Tentative jaw relation was performed using Niswonger's method. Face bow transfer was done5 and mounted on Hanau wide-Vue articulator using the split cast technique. High gothic arch tracers were attached to the occlusal rims to train the patient for achieving centric relation. Then the radiographic images were made in all the patients with occlusal rims in centric position.

Digital cephalometric radiography

All participants were positioned in the cephalostat by means of ear rods, forehead clamp with the sagittal plane at right angle to the central beam, the Frankfort horizontal (FH) plane parallel to the floor, occlusal rims in centric relation, and the lips in repose with the right side facing the film. To standardize the procedure, images for all the patients were taken by a single operator. The digital cephalometric images were produced by Kodak 8000 C Digital Panoramic and Cephalometric Machine. The Hard copy of the Kodak digital image, with a resolution of 228 dpi, was produced with a printer on a photo paper at 1:1 ratio. Manual tracing was performed using a 0.5 mm tipped 4H mechanical lead pencil on fine-grain 0.003-inch transparent acetate matte tracing papers taped to the digital hard copy cephalogram. The tracing process was performed by the same operator in a dark room withtransilluminated light using a screen viewing box. The FH plane was traced by identifying orbital [Or] point and porion [Po] point and the AE line traced by identifying points marked A and B using a millimeter ruler. Angular measurements were made using a protractor [Figure 5]. The CI angulation values obtained for the patients of four groups were tabulated and statistically analyzed.
Figure 5: Condylar inclination angulation.

Click here to view


Cone beam computed tomography

The CBCT scan of midfacial region for all the individuals in full skull view, extending from the superior aspect of the supraorbital rim to the mandibular body, was performed using a KODAK 9500 Cone Beam 3D system. The patients were made to stand in erect position with their FH plane perpendicular to the table and floor and within the circular gantry housing of the radiography tube to obtain a constant orientation of sagittal images. The patients were told to bite the occlusal rim in centric. The images were made by a single operator to standardize the procedure. The CS-3 dimension imaging software system was used for analyzing the image obtained on the selected axial image. A line along the posterior slope of the AE was drawn, extending from the deepest point on the roof of the glenoid fossa (point A) to the most convex point on the apex of the AE (point B). Similarly, the FH plane was drawn joining the two points – Po and Or. The angle made between FH plane and AE line was premeditated to obtain CI angle [Figure 5]. The data obtained were tabulated and then statistically analyzed.


  Results Top


The obtained values were tabulated and analyzed using Kruskal–Wallis tests and Mann–Whitney tests with Bonferroni correction for multiple pairwise comparison.

[Table 2] shows the comparison between the groups using Kruskal–Wallis test. Significance value P was less than 0.05 and showed significant CI values in CBCT with a value of 0.043.
Table 2: Kruskal-Wallis test to compare between facial forms in cone beam computed tomography

Click here to view


In [Table 3], overall comparison for each groups was made between digital cephalogram and CBCT using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The results were significant for group I, group III, and group IV.
Table 3: Wilcoxon signed ranks test to compare between cone beam computed tomography and digital cephalogram (overall)

Click here to view


[Table 4] shows the comparison between groups and the P value level of significance was less than 0.005. In group I the mean was 16.20, group II it was 14.20, group III it was 5.50, and group IV it was 6.10.
Table 4: Kruskal-Wallis test to compare between the four facial forms

Click here to view


[Table 5] shows the descriptive statistics for the difference between digital cephalogram and CBCT of the CI for all the groups. The mean, SD, and median values were obtained for each group. The mean ± SD values for each group were group I = 1.14 ± 1.06, group II = 0.46 ± 0.74, group III=−1.24 ± 1.09, and group IV=−1.02 ± 0.78. The median ( first quartile, third quartile) values for each group are group I − 0.70 (0.60, 1.30), group II = 0.90 (0.30.1.00), group III=−0.90 (−1.20, −0.90), and group IV - 0.70 (−1.40, −0.50).
Table 5: Descriptive statistics for difference in condylar inclination of group I, group II, group III, and group IV between cone beam computed tomography and digital cephalogram

Click here to view


In [Table 6], the comparison was made between the groups for the difference values in CI obtained between CBCT and digital cephalogram by using Mann–Whitney test with Bonferroni correction for this multiple pairwise comparison. It showed significance for group I vs group III.
Table 6: Mann-Whitney test with Bonferroni correction for multiple pairwise comparison

Click here to view


In the graph scatter plot diagram showed the cumulation of CI for digital cephalogram and CBCT between 39° and 41° [Figure 6]. CI differences with digital cephalogram and CBCT between the four groups are graphically shown as box plot. The CI values of groups I and II were positive while CI of groups III and IV were negative [Figure 7].
Figure 6: Box plot diagram of comparison between cone beam computed tomography and digital cephalogram.

Click here to view
Figure 7: Box Plot diagram for comparison between condylar inclination and groups I, II, III, and IV.

Click here to view


The comparison between the differences of CI using digital cephalogram and CBCT of the four groups showed that the CI values for groups III and IV were statistically significant in both the imaging technique – digital cephalogram and CBCT.


  Discussion Top


According to Fenn, the slope of condylar path is a fixed quotient and is peculiar to each patient. Condylar path is traversed by the condyle in relation to the AE when the mandible moves from centric relation and forms the CI[22]. Katsavrias and Nickel stated that during growth, the AE is flat in early years and becomes steeper when teeth erupts and occludes while Moffet contradicted it[23].

This study coincided with Ingervall who stated that there is a marked inclination of the condylar path and marked height of the AE associated with the rectangular facial form as they had smaller inclination of face and the articular tubercle height was prominent[16]. In this study, the CI values obtained for square facial form were comparatively higher among the other groups in Digital Cephalogram. But the mean CI obtained for square facial form with CBCT was in contradiction to the results given by Ingervall in 1974. Zamacona et al.[1] noted that a distinction should be made when using different methods that measure the horizontal CI relative to different planes as different planes produce different outcomes. FH plane significantly correlated with the true horizontal and the natural head position than other hinge axis–orbital planes[24]. The other axis planes such as Camper's plane and occlusal plane were not considered as it deviated from the true horizontal and natural head position to about 6° and 10°, respectively[25]. So in this study, FH plane was used for determining the facial forms through photographs and CI using the radiographic techniques[26].

For the diagnosis and treatment in craniofacial skeletal development and orthognathic surgeries two-dimensional cephalometric radiography has been used widely. The lines and angles on the image can be analyzed by using this image. Though it is somewhat difficult to discriminate the overlapping structures, these imaging techniques are commonly used to compare the measured values from this image with the general known value to find the asymmetry[27]. The study was conducted with the Digital Cephalogram as images recorded can be manipulated and alter its visual appearance to facilitate landmark identification. Although conventional radiographic film is quite stable and can retain its evidence for many years, it is not always a trustworthy archive medium due to film deterioration[25]. On the other hand, the Digital Cephalogram reduces radiation exposure and allows all the benefits of the older digitized forms of radiology eliminating the need for film or the associated chemicals necessary for the development[28]. According to Thurzo et al. tracing on paper using hand instruments was comparable to the digitized radiographic tracings and the outcomes of studies using manual methods could be considered perfectly valid[25]. Manual tracing was found to yield more reproducible angular measurements than linear measurements when constructed on a tracing. The results of the study of the four groups with the digital cephalogram were 4–6° higher than the mean CI values applied for programming the articulator based on Hanau's formula.

When the various angles and distances were analyzed and compared between CBCT and conventional lateral cephalogram Van Vlijmen et al.[29] concluded that there was no difference in many parts. Being the most acceptable imaging technique for TMJ view, CBCT as the three-dimensional imaging technique was used to measure the CI of different facial forms in this study[28]. Ingervall stated that there is a marked inclination of the condylar path and marked height of the AE associated with the rectangular facial form. In this study, CI values obtained for group I were comparatively higher among the other groups in Digital Cephalogram. This result coincides with the study conducted by Ingervall. The mean CI obtained for group I with CBCT was in contradiction to the results given by Ingervall in 1974[16]. This study showed that facial form does correlate with the CI of the individuals while the time span of the edentulous state in the individuals also influences the CI[11],[30],[31],[32],[33],[34],[35].

The CI values for tapering and ovoid facial forms were comparatively similar in both the Digital Cephalogram and CBCT imaging techniques. So, the values obtained using the Digital Cephalogram can be applied to program the semi-adjustable articulator for any individual. The mean CI values obtained were group I – 39.00, group II – 38.00, group III – 41.20, and group IV – 41.00 which can be used to program the articulator.

Limitations of the study

The study was conducted with limited number of patients for each facial form, with uneven distribution of the genders influencing the results. Only digital photographs were used in this study and if any other facial analysis technique were followed it may influence the study results.

Further scope of the study

The possible limitations of the present study could be overcome with new clinical trials, required in the same context for future prosthodontic application.


  Conclusion Top


  1. The CI values obtained with CBCT were more significant than the values obtained with the Digital cephalogram for all facial forms
  2. The mean CI values obtained with CBCT for square facial form – 39.00, square tapering facial form – 38.00, tapering facial form – 41.20, and ovoid facial form – 41.00. So, these CI values could be used to program the semi-adjustable articulator.


Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Zamacona JM, Otaduy E, Aranda E. Study of the sagittal condylar path in edentulous patients. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 68:314–317.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Isaacson D, Trenton NJ. A clinical study of the condyl path. J Pros Den 1959; 9:927–930.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Reicheneder C, Gedrange T, Baumert U, Faltermeier A, Proff P. Variations in the inclination of the condylar path in children and adults. Angle Orthodont 2009; 79:958–963.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Hinston RJ. Changes in articular eminence morphology with dental function. Am J Physical Anthropol 1981; 54:439–455.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Acuna LEB, Aristeguieta LMR, Mantilla GM. Mandibular fossa depth variations: relation to age and dental state. Int J Morphol 2011; 29:1189–1194.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Ogawa T, Koyano K, Sarune. The influence of anterior guidance and condylar guidance on mandibular protrusive movement. J Oral Rehab 1997; 24:303–309.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Katsavrias EG. Changes in the articular eminence inclination during the craniofacial growth period. Angle Orthodont 2002; 72:258–264.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Nickel JC, McLachlan KR, Smith DM. Eminence development of the postnatal human temporomandibular joint. J Dent Res 1988; 67:896–902.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Fukui T, Tsurata M, Murata K. Correlation between facial morphology, mouth opening ability and condylar movement during opening – closing jaw movements in female adults with normal occlusion. Eur J Orthod 2002; 24:327–336.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Zoghby AE, Re JP, Perez C. Functional harmony between the sagittal condylar path inclination and the anterior guidance inclination. J Stomat Occ Med 2009; 2:131–136.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Alshali RZ, Yar R, Barclay C, Satterhwaite JD. Sagittal condylar angle and gender differences. J Prosthodont 2013; 22:561–565.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Mridul Thakur M, Jain V, Prakash H, Kumar P. A comparative evaluation of static and functional methods for recording centric relation and condylar guidance: a clinical study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2012; 12:175–181.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Gross Y, Nemcovsky M, Gazit I. The effect of three different recording materials on the reproducibility of condylar guidance registrations in three semi-adjustable articulators. J Oral Rehab 1998; 25:204–208.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
IlanGilboa M, Cardash H, Kaffe I, Gross M. Condylar guidance: correlation between articular morphology and panoramic radiographic images in dry human skulls. J Prosthet Dent 2008; 99:477–482.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Corbett N. The relation of the condylar path to the articular eminence in mandibular protrusion. Angle Orthodont 1974; 41:286–291.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Ingervall B. Relation between height of the articular tubercle of the temporomandibular joint and facial morphology. Angle Orthodont 1974; 44:15–24.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Williams L. ANew Classification of Natural and Artificial Teeth. The Dentists' Supply Co. New York: Digitized by the Internet Archive in; 2010  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Tannamala P, Pulagam M, Pottem S, Swapna B. Condylar guidance: correlation between protrusive interocclusal record and panoramic radiographic image: a pilot study. J Prosthodont 2012; 21:181–184.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Ranjan R, Sharma N, Ramu C. Dental Arch Width as related to Intercondylar distance. Indian J Dent Sci 2012; 4:31–33.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Burke G, Major A, Glover K, Prasad N. Correlations between condylar characteristics and facial morphology in class II preadolescent patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998; 114:328–336.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Kim DS, Choi SC, Lee SS. Correlation between three dimensional facial morphology and mandibular movement during maximum mouth opening and closing. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010; 110:648–656.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Nechala P, Mahoney J, Farkas LG. Digital two- dimensional photogrammetry: a comparison of three techniques of obtaining digital photographs. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 103:1819–1825.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Moffet BC. The temporomandibular joint. In: Sharry JJ. Complete Denture Prosthodontics. 2nd edition. New York, NY: McGraw Hill; 1968:56–104.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Rayapudi N, Challa P, Gandikota C, Yudhistar P, Tircoveluri S. A comparative study of linear measurements of facial skeleton using computed tomography and traditional cephalometry. APOS Trends Orthodont 2013; 3:23–30.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Thurzo A, Javorka V, Stanko P. Digital and manual cephalometric analysis. Bratis Lek Listy 2010; 111:97–100.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Krishnamoorthy B, Mamatha NS, Vinod Kumar AR. TMJ imaging by CBCT: current scenario. Ann Maxillofac Surg 2013; 3:80–83.  Back to cited text no. 26
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
27.
Oh S, Kim CY, Hong J. A comparative study between data obtained from conventional lateral cephalometry and reconstructed three-dimensional computed tomography images. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014; 40:123–129.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Krishna Prasad D, Shah N, Chethan H. A clinic-radiographic analysis of sagittal condylar guidance determined by protrusive interocclusal registration and panoramic radiographic images in humans. Contemp Clin Dent 2012; 3:383–387.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Van Vlijmen OJ, Bergé SJ, Swennen GR, Bronkhorst EM, Katsaros C, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Comparison of cephalometric radiographs obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans and conventional radiographs. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67:92–97.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Alhammahdi MS, Fayed MS, Labib AH. Comprehensive three dimensional CBCT analysis of the temporomandibular joint. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 2014; 8:352–361.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Olsson A, Posselt U. Relationship of various skull reference lines. J Prosthet Dent 1961; 11: 1045–1049.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Caglayan F, AkifSumbullu M, Akgul H. Associations between the articular eminence inclination and condylar bone changes, condylar movements and condyle-fossa shapes. Oral Radiol 2014; 30:84–91.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Sreelal T, Janardanan K, Nair AS. Age changes in horizontal condylar angle: a clinical and cephalometric study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2013; 7:110–114.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Csado K, Marton K, Kivovics P. Anatomical changes in the structure of the temporomandibular joint caused by complete edentulousness. Gerodontology 2012; 29:111–116.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Raustia M, Pirttiniemi A, SalonenA, Pyhtinen K. Effect of edentulousness on mandibular size and condyle – fossa position. J Oral Rehab 1998; 25:174–179.  Back to cited text no. 35
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed119    
    Printed12    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded26    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]