• Users Online: 644
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 16  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 121-135

Uses, accuracy and limitations of semiadjustable articulators in dentistry: a systematic review


1 Department of Prosthodontics, Rajarajeswari Dental College and Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
2 Department of Prosthodontics, Peoples College of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India

Correspondence Address:
Ramesh Chowdhary
Department of Prosthodontics, Rajarajeswari Dental College and Hospital, Bangalore 560 074, Karnataka
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/tdj.tdj_8_19

Rights and Permissions

Purpose: The article reviewed the various studies on semiadjustable articulators (SAA) to determine their uses, accuracy and limitations in orienting the cast. Materials and methods: An electronic and manual search of PubMed and Medline databases and other published articles was performed. The article concomitant to question in focus on accuracy of cast orientation on to the SAA with the help of facebow when compared to the lateral cephalogram was included. Other question in focus was whether interocclusal records used for programming the articulator are more accurate than the computerized jaw-tracking devices. Article on reliability, repeatability and interchangeability of SAA were also included. The study also focused on the use of SAA in various specialties of dentistry with the help of available literatures. Only articles in English were considered for the study. Results: The initial search resulted in 450 papers. The reviewers independently screened the abstracts for those articles related to the focus question. Of the resulted 72 studies, 16 were excluded for not being in English, resulting in 56 entries. Hand-searching yielded 2 additional papers. Conclusion: SAA seems reliable in interchangeability and promising to be used in various fields of dentistry. The condylar guidance obtained by SAA proves to be more accurate than other radiographic methods. Jaw motion analyzer is more accurate in adjusting the SAA rather than protrusive records.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed150    
    Printed18    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded39    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal